Illusions and Paradoxes Seeing is Believing? – external link
Jessica’s visual experience. – life with Jessica.
What are our eye’s for?
Very briefly, it may seem a silly question to ask what are our eyes for? However being able to see images or detect light is only part of what we do with our eyes. Seeing is one thing, knowing that we see and what we see is another.
The biggest issue Jessica, and others like her, has is that her eyes do not see images very well anymore, however she is aware of the meaning of the world around her.
Unless our brain knows what to do with the visual input then we may as well be blind! Our eyes are linked straight to our brains so that their sensory input goes directly into our brain where it is processed. Unless our brains are trained from an early age to correctly interpret the world our eyes reflect then none of us will know the meaning of the world around us. Seeing and knowing what we see and its meaning are part of a complex system called Visual perception or Cognitive perception.
Though we have 5 senses it is our sense of sight which seems to do the most to assist us interpret our world – or so we think while we can see. When someone losses any one of their 5 senses those left become more acute to compensate for the loss.
When people lose their sight their other 4 senses take up some of the slack, so to speak, to make up for their lack of vision. This explains why Jessica has extremely good mind maps of the City of Sydney and other places. Vision impaired people make the best use of touch, taste, smell and sound to compensate for their loss of vision or partial loss thereof.
Think about it! If someone was told as a child that the colour green is called blue then what colour are the trees?
I have a wonderful, marvellous wife who lives a full life under extremely difficult circumstances.
Jessica lost her sight as the result of the Pituitary adenoma – a Prolactinoma to be exact.
The tumour, situated on the posterior lobe of the Pituitary gland, grew so that it pressed upon the Optic chiasm and eventually brought about the loss of her sight. Jessica still has some sight in her left eye, though now experiences the condition known as Bilateral Hemianopia. This means that her small percentage of sight is missing its outer visual field due to damage to the Nasal nerve.
Below you will read part of an article from Wikipedia about the Optic chiasm, it will assist you if you make your way to the site to read the definition there.
When Jessica and I first met her loss of vision wasn’t immediately obvious. She did not even use her sight stick so as not to draw attention to herself, however I had not known her for very long before I realised that she needed to use the sight stick to prevent herself bumping right up against people and to indicate that there was a problem with her vision.
Over the eight years we have been together her sight has become progressively worse until now she sees with difficulty when she is out and requires the use of a cane with a roller ball to navigate her way around the City and outer suburbs. Due to her frequent seizures it is more often that not necessary for her to be guide by myself or one of the day cares who come to relieve me.
Nevertheless, Jessica makes the maximum use of her remaining vision, she can often find things on the supermarket shelf quicker than I since she knows how to use her bit of vision to scan the shelves progressively until she finds whatever we are looking for.
In the time we have been together we have put a few computers together, Jessica still works from the command prompt and does the maintenance on our computer. She also enjoys her digital camera and takes excellent photos just by pointing and shooting.
She will then work on the photos in our imaging programs, Micrografx and Image Pro 10, to bring them up to scratch and to make Panoramas and stitches which reveal entire vistas such as the coastline in Kiama near to the Blowhole caravan park. You will see some of her pictures once we load the galleries.
It is amazing what people can do to compensate for the loss of one of their senses, sometimes I might believe that my wonderful wife is not visually impaired especially when I see her wielding the electric drill to repair or create something. She cuts my hair and uses the sewing machine and she loves to wash which is not so good since I am the one who has to do the ironing.
How does it affect daily living?
Hemianopia can cause loss of confidence with doing simple daily tasks. For example: The person may feel unsafe crossing the road or going shopping, Loss of half the visual field will affect many daily tasks including reading, travel and daily living skills.
This photo with thanks from [Special Kids in the UK- page extinct]
In Jessica’s case she has her near blindness in her favour, also the experience of having had the condition for some time. In the case of those who acquired the condition recently it will take time for them to reinterpret the world they see and to train themselves to fill in the missing parts of their visual field input.
Knowledge of the topographical arrangement of visual fibres as they travel in the chiasm is of utmost importance to understand the effects of compressive lesions in this portion of the optic pathway. See Wikipedia the free encyclopaedia for a definition
The optic nerves from both eyes meet and cross at the optic chiasm, at the base of the frontal lobe of the brain. At this point the information from both eyes is combined and split according to the field of view. The corresponding halves of the field of view (right and left) are sent to the left and right halves of the brain, respectively (the brain is cross-wired), to be processed. That is, though we might expect the right brain to be responsible for the image from the left eye, and the left brain for the image from the right eye, in fact, the right brain deals with the left half of the field of view, and similarly for the left brain. (Note that the right eye actually perceives part of the left field of view, and vice versa).
Bitemporal hemianopia is a specific type of visual disturbance in which sight in the outer half of the visual field of each eye is lost. As a result, the patient retains central vision but loses sight at the edges of his or her vision. This is not always obvious to him or her, even when the damage is quite severe on objective testing, because one tends to focus attention more on objects in the centre of the visual field.
Bitemporal hemianopia is usually caused by a lesion of the pituitary gland, most commonly a benign tumour pressing on the optic chiasm. Because it is the inner (medial) part of the retina which receives light from the outer visual field, this is what is lost when the inner part of the optic nerve is damaged by such a lesion.
Hemianopia signifies a loss of half of the visual field, and bitemporal denotes the two lateral, or temporal, sides of the head. By contrast, homonymous hemianopia signifies that the same half of each visual field is lost, i.e. all vision on the left, or on the right, of the midline. Such a pattern of visual loss is caused by damage to the more distal part of the optic radiation, most commonly by a stroke.
The diagram below shows how loss of vision varies depending upon at which level in the visual l system is damaged, see below for legend.
See 3 of this diagram.
1 = central scotoma secondary to optic neuritis (does not respect the vertical meridian)
2 = Total blindness of the right eye from a complete lesion of the optic nerve
3 = Bitemporal hemianopia from a complete lesion of the optic chiasm
4 = Right nasal hemianopia from a peri chiasmal lesion
5 = Right homonymous hemianopia from a complete left optic tract lesion
6 = Right homonymous superior quadrantanopia caused by partial involvement of the optic radiation in the left temporal lobe (Meyer’s loop)
7 = Right homonymous inferior quadrantanopia caused by partial involvement of the optic radiation in the left parietal lobe
8 = Right homonymous hemianopia from a complete lesion of the left optic radiation
9 = Right homonymous hemianopia (with macular sparing) from a posterior cerebral artery occlusion causing ischemia of the calcarine cortex of the occipital lobe